skip to Main Content

I’ve been pushing myself recently to resist my first reaction when I feel motivated to make an image, and instead try to look deeper, and for longer periods of time. Not that this is anything new in general, as I’ve talked about this approach many times before. But it’s so easy to rely on what’s worked in the past, or default to what’s comfortable. And so it’s always a good habit to ask yourself if you’re truly exploring all of the available options.

That was certainly the case on this particular morning when I saw this small pool of water reflecting the blue sky. I liked the gradation of the colors, and the ripples caused by the wind, as well as the branches creating a nice color contrast. But the more I tried to simplify the image (thinking it was too busy) the more I felt something was missing.

That’s when I realized that what I was seeing with my eyes, what attracted me almost subconsciously, was the chaotic energy of the branches—the lines that they created and repeated—to convey an almost rhythmic pattern. And so I took a different visual approach and explored using the branches and the angles they created with the edges of the camera frame to create movement through the image.

And for me that creates the tension between the lines flaring from the bottom corners of the image to the top where they gain more visual weight, and the color gradient getting darker and stronger from top to bottom. Finally, the rocks add some grounding, something out of the reflection that creates perspective, some spacial depth space between the different elements of the image. I tried both vertical and horizontal formats, but as you can see the vertical is much stronger for both the color gradient and nature of the lines.

The red lines and arrow show the repetition and movement of the eye from bottom (or foreground) to top. The green lines show the opposing movement from weaker to stronger color, the gradient. The yellow circles show the brightest areas and the greatest visual weight.

I used my Olympus E-M1 with an Olympus 40-150mm lens to frame the image at 158mm (35mm equivalent). Settings were f/8 @ 1/100 sec, ISO 200, no filters.

Another subtle but important aspect to this image is the movement of the water. A perfect reflection would have made the tress too distinctive, and I quite like the slight blur that the water creates, emphasizing the solidity of the rocks. Too much wind and the lines disappear, making the image too ambiguous.

Many subtle design elements go into making strong compositions, not to mention the most important element of all – does the image convey something of what the photographer felt or intended.

And for me the answer is less interesting that the creative approach we take to make images. That is where you learn the most, when you’re reaching for something that is right at the edge of your ability.

RR Jr

Experience your work in the real world. The Printmaker Masterclass is live and growing! Learn more here.

This Post Has 2 Comments

  1. Robert, I enjoyed your analysis a lot. Did you notice the diagonal bottom-left to mid-upper-right (formed by the dark + light areas)? – I saw it immediately.

  2. Great article, Robert. Many thanks.

    Inspires one to not forget the intellectual analysis while pondering on the artistic elements in an image.

    Keep it coming!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

×Close search
Search